Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Green (Aircraft Design Engineer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Green (Aircraft Design Engineer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability, I couldn't even reliably verify that he exists. Article was Prod'ded, but as it was removed by a brand-new, one-edit only editor, it was not allowed to be reinstated. Burocracy gone mad, but I guess an AfD will do as well. The short history of the article is filled with completely new editors, so it looks as if something fishy is going on here. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no RS, no sign of notability. Mztourist (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing in the article (which is more like a family history piece) that indicates anything of note for a mention in the encyclopedia never mind a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It appears a user saw this article and got a wild hair to write about a "hometown hero". While no doubt distinguished, Mr. Green is not notable, and the article is breathlessly overwraught trying to make him so. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. And the lack of proper use of citation tags, inline citations or an infobox doesn't help the case. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I'm dubious about some content, it looks like it is/was sourced from the subject himself so the creator may be in a COI. Zawed (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.